Now can you see the monument?  It is of wood 
built somewhat like a box.  No. Built 
like several boxes in descending sizes 
one above the other. 
Each is turned half-way round so that 
its corners point toward the sides 
of the one below and the angles alternate. 
Then on the topmost cube is set 
a sort of fleur-de-lys of weathered wood, 
long petals of board, pierced with odd holes, 
four-sided, stiff, ecclesiastical. 
From it four thin, warped poles spring out, 
(slanted like fishing-poles or flag-poles) 
and from them jig-saw work hangs down, 
four lines of vaguely whittled ornament 
over the edges of the boxes 
to the ground. 
The monument is one-third set against 
a sea; two-thirds against a sky. 
The view is geared 
(that is, the view's perspective) 
so low there is no "far away," 
and we are far away within the view. 
A sea of narrow, horizontal boards 
lies out behind our lonely monument, 
its long grains alternating right and left 
like floor-boards-spotted, swarming-still, 
and motionless.  A sky runs parallel, 
and it is palings, coarser than the sea's: 
splintery sunlight and long-fibred clouds. 
"Why does that strange sea make no sound? 
Is it because we're far away? 
Where are we?  Are we in Asia Minor, 
or in Mongolia?" 
                        An ancient promontory, 
an ancient principality whose artist-prince 
might have wanted to build a monument 
to mark a tomb or boundary, or make 
a melancholy or romantic scene of it ... 
"But that queer sea looks made of wood, 
half-shining, like a driftwood sea. 
And the sky looks wooden, grained with cloud. 
It's like a stage-set; it is all so flat! 
Those clouds are full of glistening splinters! 
What is that?" 
                        It is the monument. 
"It's piled-up boxes, 
outlined with shoddy fret-work, half-fallen off, 
cracked and unpainted.  It looks old." 
-The strong sunlight, the wind from the sea, 
all the conditions of its existence, 
may have flaked off the paint, if ever it was painted, 
and made it homelier than it was. 
"Why did you bring me here to see it? 
A temple of crates in cramped and crated scenery, 
what can it prove? 
I am tired of breathing this eroded air, 
this dryness in which the monument is cracking." 

It is an artifact 
of wood.  Wood holds together better 
than sea or cloud or sand could by itself, 
much better than real sea or sand or cloud. 
It chose that way to grow and not to move. 
The monument's an object, yet those decorations, 
carelessly nailed, looking like nothing at all, 
give it away as having life, and wishing; 
wanting to be a monument, to cherish something. 
The crudest scroll-work says "commemorate," 
while once each day the light goes around it 
like a prowling animal, 
or the rain falls on it, or the wind blows into it. 
It may be solid, may be hollow. 
The bones of the artist-prince may be inside 
or far away on even drier soil. 
But roughly but adequately it can shelter 
what is within (which after all 
cannot have been intended to be seen). 
It is the beginning of a painting, 
a piece of sculpture, or poem, or monument, 
and all of wood.  Watch it closely.