Cynthia Shin-feng Wu -
"The newsletter is worth keeping, but the format should change. Reduce the number of
columns, be more brief with language, simplify the content. It's not neces-sary to provide
too much information. Publish it once a year. The editor should get a contact person from
each M.A. graduation class, and each of them can write up part of the material. Thus,
every year the newsletter would have its own special character."
William Lee - "The
news-letter seems a little crowded."
Elyssa Chang - "The
way it is now seems good. If you need help, I'd be happy to try my best."
Fred Chih-wei Chang -
"Although I don't have any suggestions for improvement, I hope the newsletter will
enjoy a long life. I really ap-preciate it. It's good to know how my teachers and
schoolmates are doing."
Sharon Ou - "The
news-letter is very good."
Joyce Chi-hui Liu -
"My response is the newsletter is a great contribution and blessing for all of us who
care about the program and wish to know something about one another. It fulfills at least
the function of the above words, and doesn't need to do more. Of course it'd be better if
more people would send news back and a larger and more proportion-ate picture of our
alumni and alumnae could be presented. But it really depends on peo-ple's feedback . . .
and this requires so much extra work! Perhaps we should live with the current conditions
and wait for its slow growth. Getting class representa-tives to slowly shift part of the
work to our alumni may be a good beginning."
Winifred Huang- "Our
newsletter has a bright future as long as someone is will-ing to be the editor, and our
readers are happy to corre-spond. With the exception of the teachers in our institute, I
doubt though the possibility of finding people to work as an editorial team. Most who have
graduated live far apart, and those who are still studying may not be able to spare the
time. Well, per-haps we can find represent-atives in each area of Taiwan and they could be
responsible to contact the alumni near them and write up a section for it."
Joyce Yang - "How do
I feel about the current news-letter? Guess what? I love it! It's just marvelous. This is
definitely not flattery or ©ç°¨§¾. I actually showed my last copy to colleagues here,
and saw envy on their faces. I feel proud of it. So my view is the newsletter must be
carried on and become a tradition in our institute. An editorial team? That might be a
good idea, but I wonder if there would be any volun-teers to do the work . . . ."
John Liu - "I look
forward to the newsletter. I find that the last one was more colorful than the earlier one
because of its content and style. I suggest that the new gradu-ating classmates work as an
editorial team to continue it."
In response to the January 1995 edition, Father
Edward Vargo (¼Ú¶§Þ³¯«¤÷) wrote: "Congratulations on a superb
second edition. It really flows well, and shows what a varied and interesting group of
people it is that populates the Graduate Institute. Fine work."¡»
|