![]() |
![]() |
Read the author's paper very carefully and evaluate the paper according to the checklist. Remember to comment on both good and weak points. |
1). Did the author employ any helpful difinition techniques (full-sentence difinition, classification, analysis, example illustration, description, comparison and contrast, history of the word, etc.?) when difining the subject (or key term) of the paper? Name some examples of good usage of techniques. |
2). Are the results effective? Do the discussions help you to see the subject defined more clearly or concretely? Or do they give you a new insight into the subject? Name some examples. |
3). Are there any parts of the paper that you do not agree or you do not understand very clearly? Take notes here and discuss them with the author. |
LANGUAGE:
1. Are there any spelling errors?
2. Are there any S-V agreement errors?
3. Are there any unclear parts in the paper for
you? Tell the author your troubles reading those parts?